Login Register
 
   
Register and let the world know what you think---and take a look at 911Truth for Beginners - 101

This is the PDX Forum for REGISTERED USERS to discuss issues of advocacy and explore ideas and issues relating to spreading awareness of the Omissions, Distortions and Unanswered Questions surrounding the events of September 11, 2001.  This forum is NOT for discussing details about evidence regarding past False Flag events per se

NEW USERS:  In order to receive Email Updates to any of the forums or replies to topics you must click "Email Me" at least once in each forum you are interested in receiveing emails from.  AT VERY LEAST enable this option on the DIRECT EMAIL NOTIFICATION CATEGORIES (E-Blasts) Forum group.  This will act like a List Server. 

TIP:  I have noticed that people are using the "Quick Reply" at the bottom of each post.  This feature is TEXT only and does not recognize web hyperlinks.  If you want to provide a link for someone then use the "Add Reply" link. Then you can paste and new link and it will be active. After you paste a link remember to add a space to let the Editor know that you are done with the link and it will make it active.

For help using this or any of our Forums, read our Forum Users Guide.

 Portland Area Forum Minimize

Subject: Nation Impeachment News Digest Sun Nov 16th 2008
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author Messages
~gleno~User is Offline

Posts:22

20 Nov 2008 3:12 AM  

The NIN Weekly Digest

Portland OR                       T                        Vol. I, No. 23                             11/16/08
Edited by Barbara Ellis, National Impeachment Network (NIN) coordinator for South Side DFA MeetUp Group and the PDX chapter of We the People National Coalition for Impeachment.
 

PLEASE COPY/SEND TO YOUR BLAST LISTS AND ACTIVIST FRIENDS  

____________________________________

 Call Reps. Blumenauer, Wu, and Hooley This Week

And Tell Them to Push Rep. Tammy Baldwin’s Repeal Bill

If none of the ideas above moves you into action this week, call the Capitol Operator (1-800-828-0498/1-800-614-2803) and ask for Reps. Blumenauer, Wu, Hooley, and DeFazio. When the intern answers, tell them to pass the word to push Wisconsin’s Rep. Tammy Baldwin’s bill H.RES 1509 to a vote.  It repeals all of the impeachable offenses of the Bush regime by:

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the next president of the United States should immediately work to reverse damaging and illegal actions taken by the Bush/Cheney Administration and collaborate with Congress to proactively prevent any further abuses of executive branch power. 

To download the text (4 pages), the URL is:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.RES.1509

Baldwin hoppered it on September 26 and it’s sitting in Conyers’ House Judiciary Committee waiting for action. It’s also in such committees as the Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, and Intelligence. 

She was among House Judiciary Committee members who, in that special July 25 “non-hearing” set up by Chairman John Conyers, denounced the Bush regime for eight years of high crimes rising to the Constitutional level of standards for impeachment. She’s been a co-sponsor of every bill demanding impeachment investigations from the 109th Congress (Conyers’ HR 635) to the current 110th Congress (Kucinich’s H.RES 333/799 in the first session; 1258/1345 in the second). 

Baldwin was also targeted to lead the Nixon Flooding Plan by which nearly 40 House Democrats were urged to hopper individual impeachment bills on a daily basis. She was lobbied in mid-February by the three-member team from the Portland chapter of We the People National Coalition for Impeachment and by summer lobbying from NIN coordinators.  


Let’s Make Conyers Keep His Vow to Start

Impeachment After the Election

On Nov 10, 2008, at 7:31 AM, NIN Coordinator Jodin Morey (Mpls./St. Paul) wrote:

While speaking on the topic of impeachment Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) promised that after the November 4 elections, he would pursue legal actions against the Bush administration. Conyers is in a unique position to initiate impeachment. As the chair of the House Judiciary Committee (the body which would be responsible for initiating impeachment), he has been the sole obstacle to impeachment occurring ever since he and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi took Impeachment "off the table."

However, now it appears that Conyers will be pushing impeachment. At the "Take Back America Conference" [held months ago], Conyers replied, "Yes, you have my word on that." He then shook the hand of a questioner resolutely. The Congressman was speaking in a panel, "The Republic Against the Rogue Presidency" [and]…described what was keeping him from pursuing impeachment. He said that he wanted to wait until Obama was elected, as he feared that impeachment would become an election issue.

Please write to Congressman Conyers on his website and thank him for finally accountability:

John.Conyers@mail.house.gov

Or by snail-mail:

    2426 Rayburn Building/Washington, DC 20515

Or a phone call or FAX: 

    (202) 225-5126

FAX (202) 225-0072 Fax

Also please contact your own Congressperson and ask her/him to support Conyers in finally holding the Bush Administration be held accountable.

Congressional Switchboard:            1-800-828-0498.

 __________________________

On Nov 13, 2008, at 9:22 PM, NIN Coordinator John Kennedy (Denver) wrote:

Conyers promised impeachment after the election. 

Hold him to it.

ITS ALL YOU GOT! USE IT!

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/

   Conyers to impeachment mob:   

http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=5012

         John Conyers made this promise to hold hearings after the election and we all need to pressure him to do it.  How we going to do it? 

Don't think this will work?  Come up with a workable alternative idea. 

         Rumour is  is that House Speaker Pelosi is changing the House leadership positions to those of reps who are more progressive... is there an opening in this.   Is she signaling that she is open to proposals she couldn't be open to before the election?

         We've come too far to give up now. 

         Impeachment will probably be dead forever if we don't get the HJC and Conyers to call for hearings in this session. 

         We must find the resolve to hang in there until the end of this session of the House. They tortured people!!!  They got American Soldiers killed for their lies.

         [T]he lame duck session starts [Monday].  Can we email everyone on our local lists to contact Conyers, the members of the House Judicary Committee, and all their own state's Congressmen to call for immediate impeachment hearings?

         We can't just wait for prosecution after Obama is sworn in.  The Democrats who refuse to impeach will no doubt refuse to seriously investigate or indict. 

         We need to act now to get Conyers to call for hearing.  Is everybody on board?

 

And Here’s a Sample Letter to Conyers

On Nov 11, 2008 6:21 PM, NIN Coordinator Susan Serpa (Boston) suggested writing something like this to Conyers:

 To: john.conyers@mail.house.gov,

 Dear Chairman Conyers,

  In these critical remaining weeks of the Bush Administration, please remember your promise to the people and your oath to [support and defend] the Constitution.  This is no longer simply about removal from office.  The election is over and the voters (and the candidates from both the right and left) have demonstrated their repulsion of the Bush Administration's failure to lead the free world. 

  However, President-Elect Barak Obama cannot undo the damage of the Bush Administration without your help in laying the groundwork through impeachment hearings.  This is about preserving the future of our nation by demanding accountability.  Only impeachment can prevent George W. Bush from pardoning himself and the rest of his Administration. Only impeachment can prevent the dangerous precedent of the lawless unitary executive from being passed along to future Administrations.

  Appoint Vincent Bugliosi as Special Prosecutor to try George W. Bush. He successfully prosecuted 105 of 106 cases (most notably the Manson murders) and is ready to serve papers on Bush, Cheney, and Rove.

  I appreciate your thoughts on this subject and trust you will weigh your duty to Constitution above allegiance any political alliances.  For the sake of the future of this great nation, I urge you to begin immediately in earnest with resolve, tenacity and force.

  Thank you,

_______________________

Last Wednesday, NIN Coordinator Susan Serpa (Boston) at 10:26 AM wrote us:

…. I saw Bruce Fein this morning and he told me he's meetig with Conyers … Friday [Nov. 14].  I am working directly with Bugliosi to find a DA willing to procecute.  Much work to be done.

________________________

On Nov 9, 2008, at 6:01 PM, NIN Coordinator Carol Wolman wrote:

Before President-elect Barack Obama takes office, Bush can still do mischief.  This is no time to relax our impeachment efforts.  We must let Congress and Bush/Cheney know that we are still vigilant, in order to prevent further crimes and to encourage the restoration of justice and accountability.

 

Let’s Target County District Attorneys With Attorney-General, Gubenatorial Ambitions to File Murder Charges on Bush

On Nov 8, 2008, at 5:53 PM, NIN member Ralph Lopez wrote:

Do we have a list of all the county DAs?  I think they are our real targets...what we should do is say: "Look, how would you like to knock-off your …. boss in the next election?  We'll run a TV spot in your state urging him to prosecute [Bush for murder]. And when he doesn't, you announce: ‘He isn’t stepping up to the plate so it’s my duty…[Then,] Initiate a prosecution. You’ll get national press and our help. And you're the next [state] attorney general (or governor) in 2 years!  You da man!”

It will be an ambitious Young Turk DA most likely to do this...

     Of course Republicans must be included,

 
Or Try Michael Moore/Move-On, et al. to Push Charges

On Nov 9, 2008, at 9:38 PM, NIN Coordinator Sharon Tipton (Irvine CA) wrote:

Contacting MoveOn, Michael Moore, and other large groups and media figures to start a marketing campaign [for impeachment or a murder trial of Bush and Cheney].

Are the ACLU and NLG doing any major pushes? What about international groups like Amnesty International?

Churches:  A church down the street from me in very Red Orange County has a banner which reads "Torture Is a Moral Issue". Perhaps through Sojourner Magazine, progressive Christians will see the need for justice? Perhaps AME Church will back it. Torture is a civil-rights issue.

The Ron Paul folks (who I've protested with against incumbent John Campbell) are already protesting for the closing of the Fed. Perhaps they'd be interested in joining on.

________________________

On Nov 10, 2008, at 5:04 AM, NIN Coordinator John Kennedy (Denver) wrote:

          The National ACLU has been against impeachment of Bush and Cheney.  A couple of the state ACLU groups came out for it, one in Florida and one in California.  This is one of the biggest problems.  They led the fight to impeach Nixon but are exactly the opposite with Bush 

         MoveOn has been dead set against impeachment.

         National Lawyers Guild was for it.

         My impression is that Amnesty International is against impeachment. 

          One wonders, though, that since Obama is safely our next president if these groups might come onboard if we tried to get it done before Obama takes the oath on January 20th?

 ___________________________ 

Well, Then, Let's Promote Impeachment Via the Obama Transition Team, Web Folks

On Nov 10, 2008, at 7:51 AM, NIN member Victoria Satta (Colorado) wrote:

Question:  Do you really want to be successful [in impeachment]?  Are you seriously willing to do anything it takes to save the Constitution and hold them accountable?

If yes, then let's not ignore the "political reality" of this situation.  The only way to get anyone to do anything about impeachment—which is clearly our only way to hold them accountable unless we're willing to wait for the Hague for years and years—is to lobby the Obama [transition] team:

http://www.change.gov

 Only they have the power to move Pelosi to open hearings.  It is beyond everything we've done so far.  Why waste our time with this strategy and that strategy?

I have a plan but I can't do it without everyone jumping on board.  Did you read the weekend statements that Joe Trippi put out?  If not, please do it.  If you understand the power of the Netroots and the Obama brilliance in expanding the Dean/Trippi Netroots team from 2004, then you understand that he has set us up.

Please go to http://www.barackobama.com. 

            And read this link:

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/chrishughesatthecampaign/gGxZvh

            Obama is a genius in case you didn't recognize it.  LOL... yes, it's been a long time since we can say that about almost any politician.

Go back to the www.barackobama.com front page and sign up! 

From that site, millions of activists just like us have proven that they are willing to work for change.

We know about pardons, don't we?  With the flick of the pen on the 20th of January 2009, Bush can save them all.

I know you don't want that.

Then, please think about the power that [Obama] gave us... He expects us to learn to use technology and the tools he provides.  So PLEASE do that and investigate the tools.

From his own site we can each have a blog.  Go blog about impeachment and send traffic there—please.

Everyone except us (including the media) have no idea what these criminals have done. It's up to us to sell impeachment to them.  

How? 

We can set-up a sub-group and we can send impeachment messages to the BarackObama activists.  We have to sell our message to them:…. Why impeachment?  What will happen if we don't do it?

If someone can write it up, then we can post it.

….Everything else, IMO, is a waste of time because we can't impeach without Barack's intervention. We know everything there is to know about Pelosi and Conyers, don't we?  They are not our friends and they are definitely not willing to work hard now for anything but the economic stimulus package. 

So only Barack can tell them to do more than one thing.

We also know that ONLY impeachment will trump all of it.

 

You Can Also Write Obama Himself to Nudge Conyers 

On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:37 AM, NIN Co-founder Cynthia Papermaster (SF) wrote:

Let Obama know that you want him to give Conyers the go-ahead. Here's my letter: 

President-elect Obama,

Congratulations on your election. There is a feeling now that citizens will be heard, instead of ignored as happened with Cheney and Bush. Millions of citizens want Cheney and Bush held to account for their violations of the Constitution. In fact, several national polls show that over 50% of respondents think Cheney and Bush are guilty of impeachable offenses.

Only impeachment will clear the air of the toxic effects of their law-breaking. Are they guilty of treason? We won't know unless we hold impeachment hearings. Please let your friend John Conyers know that he can proceed. He has stated many times that he would like to impeach Cheney and Bush, but didn't want to hurt your chances of being elected. Now that the election is over, he must hold hearings. As was shown by most of the 13 witnesses at the Judiciary Committee hearing on July 25 there is sufficient evidence and a simple, quick procedure for establishing guilt or innocence based on crimes against the Constitution that are in the public record. No special committee, investigation or prosecutor are necessary.

Restore the Constitution and give us back our faith in Congress and the Administration.

Thank you

  

While You're Up, Give Rep. Bob Wexler a Nudge, Too

 On Nov 13, 2008, at 12:20 PM, NIN Coordinator Susan Harman (Oakland) wrote:

I just got off the phone with Ellen McClaren, legislative aide to [Rep. Bob]Wexler, who said

1. They’re not sure when [House members] are coming back to DC yet;

2. Impeachment is high on his priority list;

3. They’re waiting for the go-ahead from Dem leadership. I pointed out that Pelosi is no longer the leadership; Obama is. I think that should be the first thing we say to folks now;

4. I recommended Wexler posting his plans on PDA’s website, since it reaches so many of us; and

5. I assured her that we are ready to help in any way possible.

 

Here’s a ‘Cliffnotes’ Version of Bugliosi’s Book

About How to Prosecute Bush for Murder

On Nov 12, 2008, 2:43:47 PM PST (CA) NIN member Ralph Lopez wrote to all impeachers:



Here it is, the “Cliffnotes” version of Vince Bugliosi' best-selling The Prosecution
 of George W. Bush for Murder online for DAs and Congressmen.  If 
these little nuggets don't make one want to put Bush behind bars, I 
don't know what will.  

And these arguments work just as well for impeachment - A twofer! 

First action item is to forward the link, along with maybe a few choice passages, to your Congressman, and all the emails of his or her staff you may have on hand.

Until everyone can recite their "Prosecution" facts forward and backward!  

We need to get conversant in these talking points and call radio station talk shows 
and write letters-to-the-editor.  Also I'll have an Internet version 
which can be "Digged" to make it spread like wildfire across the net.
 Ding-dong the Wicked Witch...

Indictment for Dummies:  A Reader-Companion to Bugliosi's The
Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder: 
http://ralphlopezworld.com/vince.html

 

EVERYONE REPEAT: 

•  Bush said Iraq could act "on any given day"; that "before the
 day of horror can come, before it is too late to act, this danger must 
be removed"; "Some ask how urgent this danger is to America. The
 danger is already significant, and it only grows worse with time";
 "Each passing day could be the one on which the Iraqi regime gives 
weapons of mass destruction to a terrorist ally"; Iraq constituted "a
 threat of unique urgency"; "Iraq could launch a biological or chemical 
attack in as little as 45 minutes."

 

•   On the evening of October 7, 2002, when he spoke from
 Cincinnati at the Museum Center, Bush told the nation that
 [Saddam] Hussein was "a great danger to our nation," either by [Saddam] himself 
using "unmanned aerial vehicles" with chemical or biological 
payloads "for missions targeting the United States" or by providing 
these biological or chemical weapons to a "terrorist group or
individual terrorists" to attack us. Bush framed the threat as being 
imminent when he said this  could happen "on any given day."

   

•   The classified 2002 National Intelligence Estimate issued by 
the CIA to the Bush administration and Senate Select Committee on 
Intelligence on October 1, 2002, gave Bush notice, prior to the speech 
in Cincinnati, that the CIA did not consider Saddam Hussein an imminent threat to this nation. So when Bush told the nation on the evening of October 7 that he was an imminent threat to the security of this country, he was telling millions of Americans [a lie.]


You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums > Focus Groups > IMPEACHMENT community liason > Nation Impeachment News Digest Sun Nov 16th 2008



ActiveForums 3.7

 Print   
Registered Users Only

Only Registered users may add new conversation threads or reply to existing conversations.  If you do not see your UserName in the top right hand corner of this window then you must either log in or register to participate in this forum.

Click to select a Forum.  Click to open a Topic. Click Reply to add your own comments.  Click "Add New Topic" to start a new question or topic of conversation. Check the box "Email me when someone replies to this thread" to receive an automatic notice of activity in any forum or topic of interest.